African-style discipline: Is hitting still necessary for education?
In many African families and communities, corporal discipline has long been viewed as an educational tool. Today, this debate is coming into conflict with children’s rights, new teaching methods, and psychological repercussions. How can we balance respect for traditions with the protection of young people?
The issue of so-called “African-style” discipline—often associated with the use of physical punishment—is now sparking a profound and complex debate. While older generations maintain that a spanking or a slap once helped raise responsible and respectful children, new educational approaches—based on children’s rights and developmental psychology—call into question the effectiveness and legitimacy of educational violence.
At the heart of this discussion lies a struggle between cultural heritage and modern concerns for children’s well-being. In many African societies, strict discipline was considered essential for building character. It was often said that “if you don’t feel the pain, you don’t learn the lesson.” Elders maintained that a child who was not disciplined would become disobedient, disrespectful, or unable to adapt to social realities. The rule was to obey first, understand later. But today, in the face of social, educational, and scientific changes, these practices are increasingly being called into question.
“When I was young, a little spanking never killed anyone. We quickly learned to follow the rules. Without discipline, a child becomes rebellious,” says Grandma Aïssatou, who is in her sixties. Emmanuelle, a mother of two, says she grew up under strict discipline. But, she adds, with her own children, “I try to explain things and talk it out with them. They learn better when they understand why something is wrong.
” Psychological studies indicate that even mild punishments can have long-term negative effects. Dr. Clara MENSAH explains that “physical discipline sends a message of fear rather than learning to a child’s brain. Children may obey out of fear rather than understanding, which does not help their social and emotional development.”
The traditional argument often focuses on immediate effectiveness, since the child stops the undesirable behavior. But is this obedience long-lasting? Experts say no. According to a comparative study, children raised without the use of corporal punishment demonstrate better emotional regulation, positive communication with parents, and a greater ability to resolve conflicts. In contrast, those exposed to corporal punishment often exhibit fear, anxiety, and aggressive behaviors. These children struggle academically and face an increased risk of accepting violence as a solution.
To guide parents, educators, and communities, several constructive approaches are emerging. Explaining the rules helps children understand the consequences of their actions. Educational reasoning replaces fear.
Rather than punishing, reinforcing desirable behaviors encourages children to repeat those actions. Time-outs, the removal of a privilege, or age-appropriate chores are constructive educational tools. Experienced and new parents can share their experiences to collaboratively develop practices tailored to today’s realities.
African-style discipline, as it was practiced in the past, shaped generations within specific social contexts. But the world is changing, and today’s children are growing up in a global environment, exposed to different norms and a better understanding of human development.
Thus, it is possible to preserve positive values such as respect, responsibility, and solidarity, while abandoning physical punishments that harm young people’s psychological well-being. Breaking the cycle of educational violence does not mean giving up discipline, but rather raising our children with understanding, consistency, and mutual respect.